随笔:中国人的终极关怀

2024-04-05 4091

常有人诟病中国人缺乏终极关怀,对于生死这件大事往往只有忌讳而已。
人们更愿意关心所谓有用的事情,例如股票走势。 待到无法回避时,只能到习俗中自欺欺人,好像自己真相信烧纸钱的功用似的。
这些是现代中国的一些现象,在中华传统中并非如此。
我同意学者金观涛的观点,四大轴心对于所谓的终极问题,各有各的回答。
正好覆盖了逻辑上四种可能有的答案。
向外而出世的一神文化,重点在救赎。
向外而入世的希腊传统,重点在真理。
向内而出世的印度文化,重点在解脱。
向内而入世的中华传统,重点在(仁义)道德。
(简单而言:儒家舍身取义,求仁得仁。道家齐物齐生死,看淡生死,视死如归。禅门好事坏事都不做,悬崖撒手,舍生忘死。)
这只是大略的概括,实际情况要复杂得多,更何况四大文化还有波斯的二元对立等其他文化之间还有不少交流乃至融合。
在一神文化与希腊传统的融合中,更产生了所谓的现代文明,席卷全球,几乎影响了整个世界。
中国也不能例外,于是出现了所谓人心不古,道德败坏的现象。
其实这是相当表面的,几千年的积累怎么可能一个五四,一个文革,就荡然无存了?
别看厚黑学盛行,其实也是迷信道德修身是万能的,只是反向操作而已。
一直放不下无私无我的初心,总想着狠斗心念,也只是古人的灭人欲的滥觞而已。
要具体分析阐述,我还可以写很多。
但我不是什么学者,这些不该是我的business.
算了。对感兴趣的朋友再次推荐金观涛的著作。不是很感兴趣的估计读不下去,不够有趣,不够通俗。
贴主:湖叶于2024_04_05 17:50:33编辑
评论列表 (1)
  • 湖叶 2024-04-05 17:36:56
    modern civilizationComparing to modern civilization which started in Dutch and England, none of others have made more impact to human beings.

    Due to it people's personal life seemed having become much better if you care about the sense of body only.

    But if I was a Dutchman or Englishman, I would not be very proud.

    Think about that song by Pink Floyd, "you are just another brick in the wall."

    A civilized society should give talented people more chances,

    since civilization means more detailed division of jobs.

    Otherwise, all of Mozart can do is singing and dancing aroud firepile in the night.

    But, modern civiliztion is too focus on being effective and constantly tryin to make people replacable parts of a hugh machine , inclunding a war machine.

    In order to adapt to the various war machines and try to be part of them, people are losing the ability to remain independent (especially to think independently) and their talents are diminishing generation after generation. War does not make us better.

    People often imagine the environment as a colosseum. The environment chooses those who suit them, not the strong. It is the weak (the simple-minded) who suit their environment (and become part of the war machine).

    The Western push for individuality was an illusion and the reality was that the family could not be regulated into a screw or a brick to the detriment of industrialisation.

    In the film Shawshank, there is a word called "institutionalisation".

    People are divided into different prisons of the mind.

    Not only are they used to these walls, but they are born into them, a brick in the wall, and they even enjoy it so much that they are willing to sacrifice everything for words like "glory" (or, ironically, "freedom").

    All similar military governing disguised by slogans.

    Since there are so many people keep thinking shallowly, not good must evil, not rich must loser,

    I feel it is unfortunate for human being to have so many tools of high techonology, just like a boy playing huge knife.

    By the way, from my view , the invention of modern business in Dutch is more important than industry revolution in England.

    It has changed the way of organization.

    In traditional society, including Roman or China, including anciet Greece, the society was not based on a buch of total stangers, which means the potential to expand unlimitedly,

    including a power which be called as production capacity by Maxist,

    but acutally also a destroying capacity to the nature.

    Modern people can easily move for one company to company , it seems kind of a freedom.

    But what the cost?
返回