科学研究的是电视剧剧情背后的逻辑。 宗教是对电视机原理的想象,体现了人们的愿望,愿意相信这原理,不用任何证明,也无法证明,本来就是不可知的。
They are in two total different, even opposite territories, so, science have never proved and can never prove religion.
Let me draw an analogy.
By studying tv drama, we can know nothing about how the television work,
those who get a glimpse of other channel don't know about it better than you either.
The First Cause is unnamable,
It is as if we are living within a serialized television drama.
Science studies the logic behind the development of the drama, including the drama of the so-called evolution of nature.
Religion is the imagination of the principle of the television set (the stage of the drama) and embodies the wishes of people.
They want to believe in some imagining of an ultimate principle of this stage/Tv.
It doesn't matter that there is no proof, because they want to believe it.
Nor can it be proved, because this ultimate mystery is inherently unknowable.
The creator (author) could be typing at random. We just happen to be living in a readable novel in which logic seems to be at work, but not really, and it is the typer who creates all the illusions that is really at work.
It doesn't matter who the author is. (It is the eternal ultimate question and secret, hidden not only behind all that we sense, but also by all the concepts we imagine, including the Tao, God and emptiness.
One might think that the creator (the author) is so important that all meaning depends on him. But is the meaning of an author complete if he has no readers, especially the author of a detective novel? You might even ask: does he really have any meaning, no matter how big he is, how long he lives, or how great he is in any way?
I asked my son the other day, when he was a little boy, "Is the sky blue?" ." No, at night it's black." He's clever." If there was a superman whose eyes could and always did see infrared or ultraviolet light, would the sky be blue or black for him?" Without the eyes of life, colour means nothing to the sky.
Why should we doubt the meaning of life, why should we not doubt the meaning of the universe, or even the meaning of the creator. No matter how small we may be, no matter how short our lives may be.
The meaning of life is to admire this process from birth to death.
At the beginning, as a child we can only taste sweet,
we reject all the bitterness.
After growing, we may have a cup of coffee or tea everyday.
If this world is kind of paradise, it would be boring eventually.
If there is an author who is being called by someones as God,
then we, the readers are the ones who fullfill his purpose.
I don't think his work is just as simple as a fairy tale or a simple war story between two sides.
Since there are so many people keep think shallowly, not good must evil, not rich must loser,
I feel it is unfortunate for human being to have so many tools of high techonology, just like a boy playing huge knife.
They are in two total different, even opposite territories, so, science have never proved and can never prove religion.
Let me draw an analogy.
By studying tv drama, we can know nothing about how the television work,
those who get a glimpse of other channel don't know about it better than you either.
The First Cause is unnamable,
It is as if we are living within a serialized television drama.
Science studies the logic behind the development of the drama, including the drama of the so-called evolution of nature.
Religion is the imagination of the principle of the television set (the stage of the drama) and embodies the wishes of people.
They want to believe in some imagining of an ultimate principle of this stage/Tv.
It doesn't matter that there is no proof, because they want to believe it.
Nor can it be proved, because this ultimate mystery is inherently unknowable.
The creator (author) could be typing at random. We just happen to be living in a readable novel in which logic seems to be at work, but not really, and it is the typer who creates all the illusions that is really at work.
It doesn't matter who the author is. (It is the eternal ultimate question and secret, hidden not only behind all that we sense, but also by all the concepts we imagine, including the Tao, God and emptiness.
One might think that the creator (the author) is so important that all meaning depends on him. But is the meaning of an author complete if he has no readers, especially the author of a detective novel? You might even ask: does he really have any meaning, no matter how big he is, how long he lives, or how great he is in any way?
I asked my son the other day, when he was a little boy, "Is the sky blue?" ." No, at night it's black." He's clever." If there was a superman whose eyes could and always did see infrared or ultraviolet light, would the sky be blue or black for him?" Without the eyes of life, colour means nothing to the sky.
Why should we doubt the meaning of life, why should we not doubt the meaning of the universe, or even the meaning of the creator. No matter how small we may be, no matter how short our lives may be.
The meaning of life is to admire this process from birth to death.
At the beginning, as a child we can only taste sweet,
we reject all the bitterness.
After growing, we may have a cup of coffee or tea everyday.
If this world is kind of paradise, it would be boring eventually.
If there is an author who is being called by someones as God,
then we, the readers are the ones who fullfill his purpose.
I don't think his work is just as simple as a fairy tale or a simple war story between two sides.
Since there are so many people keep think shallowly, not good must evil, not rich must loser,
I feel it is unfortunate for human being to have so many tools of high techonology, just like a boy playing huge knife.
评论列表 (0)
发新帖
楼主前期主贴
•
新版《禅宗语录笔记》
• ChatGPT还是蛮好玩的。
• 修改续写《姜大神之诸神空间》中,估计没空来此地了。
• 独裁未必集权
• 随笔 中医与伪科学
• 有谁见过电子吗? 原子或许可从电子显微镜里看到。电子呢?谁见过?
• 个人存在的意义
• 现代商业 既有好的地方,也有坏的地方的
• 口号
• 随笔:中国人的终极关怀
• What are the reasons for living in a world
• 实际哪有进化?
• 常不等于正 (集体自杀也是自杀,不是升天)
• 随笔:过程比结果重要,手段比目的重要
• 权利与权力音同意不同
• 辩证?物质?无私?
• 随笔 再谈摩登社会的缘起
• 投入?产出?
• 无为
• ChatGPT还是蛮好玩的。
• 修改续写《姜大神之诸神空间》中,估计没空来此地了。
• 独裁未必集权
• 随笔 中医与伪科学
• 有谁见过电子吗? 原子或许可从电子显微镜里看到。电子呢?谁见过?
• 个人存在的意义
• 现代商业 既有好的地方,也有坏的地方的
• 口号
• 随笔:中国人的终极关怀
• What are the reasons for living in a world
• 实际哪有进化?
• 常不等于正 (集体自杀也是自杀,不是升天)
• 随笔:过程比结果重要,手段比目的重要
• 权利与权力音同意不同
• 辩证?物质?无私?
• 随笔 再谈摩登社会的缘起
• 投入?产出?
• 无为